PORTFOLIO COMPARISON / ONE VARIABLE
Permanent Portfolio Backtest
Backtest a Permanent Portfolio using an explicit 25% US equity, long Treasury, Treasury-bill and gold ETF proxy.
HISTORICAL BACKTEST RESULT
60% SPY / 40% AGG vs Permanent Portfolio
Historical calculation from cached Marketstack EOD data. Annual rebalancing, $10,000 initial value, nominal USD before fees and taxes. The disclosed portfolio definitions—not an AI model—produce the result.
RUN THIS PORTFOLIO
Change the rule, then compare the new result.
WHAT TO COMPARE
Read the trade-off as a system.
- 01Ending value
- 02Maximum drawdown
- 03Asset contribution
- 04Recovery path
WHEN TO LOOK
Locate where the difference appeared.
A useful comparison shows whether an advantage was broad or created by one unusually favorable period. Review the portfolio backtest methodology to understand how the same rules are applied across a shared data window.
PORTFOLIO RULE / DISCLOSED IMPLEMENTATION
Four-sleeve ETF proxy
This is a liquid ETF implementation of the four-asset allocation, not a claim that ETF performance reproduces every historical Permanent Portfolio result.
REBALANCINGAnnual rebalancing to four equal 25% sleeves.
DATA WINDOWThe effective window begins at the first shared EOD date for all selected ETF proxies.
STRATEGY CONTEXT
What this portfolio strategy means.
A short definition, the reason investors return to it, and the historical context behind the name. It is context for a backtest—not an investment recommendation.
What it is
The Permanent Portfolio is a four-way allocation: US equities, long-term Treasuries, short-term Treasuries or cash, and gold at 25% each in this ETF implementation. Its design assumes that different assets may help in different economic conditions. The visible portfolio is a liquid modern proxy, not a recreation of every historical instrument used by earlier versions.
Why investors use it
Investors use the framework when they value economic diversification and want a simple, fixed rule rather than tactical forecasts. Its appeal is the attempt to balance growth assets with nominal safety and inflation-sensitive exposure. The trade-off is equally important: a quarter of the portfolio may sit in assets that lag strongly during a particular equity-led market, and long Treasuries bring material duration risk.
Historical context
The strategy is associated with Harry Browne, who presented the idea as a way to own assets for prosperity, recession, inflation, and deflation without predicting which regime arrives next. It later became a durable reference point in all-weather portfolio discussions. The original concept predates modern ETFs, so this page labels its VTI, TLT, SHY, and GLD portfolio as a disclosed proxy rather than an exact historical reconstruction.