PORTFOLIO COMPARISON / ONE VARIABLE
Golden Butterfly Portfolio Backtest
Backtest a Golden Butterfly Portfolio using a disclosed US ETF proxy: stocks, small value, long Treasuries, short Treasuries and gold at 20% each.
HISTORICAL BACKTEST RESULT
60% SPY / 40% AGG vs Golden Butterfly
Historical calculation from cached Marketstack EOD data. Annual rebalancing, $10,000 initial value, nominal USD before fees and taxes. The disclosed portfolio definitions—not an AI model—produce the result.
RUN THIS PORTFOLIO
Change the rule, then compare the new result.
WHAT TO COMPARE
Read the trade-off as a system.
- 01Ending value
- 02Maximum drawdown
- 03Sleeve contribution
- 04Start-date sensitivity
WHEN TO LOOK
Locate where the difference appeared.
A useful comparison shows whether an advantage was broad or created by one unusually favorable period. Review the portfolio backtest methodology to understand how the same rules are applied across a shared data window.
PORTFOLIO RULE / DISCLOSED IMPLEMENTATION
Five-sleeve ETF proxy
The ETF choices are disclosed proxies for an allocation concept. A different small-value or cash proxy can change the result.
REBALANCINGAnnual rebalancing to five equal 20% sleeves.
DATA WINDOWThe backtest automatically uses the first common EOD date of these ETF proxies; it is not a synthetic pre-ETF reconstruction.